Each week we round up the most consequential developments in the drone sector — capital flows, contracts, regulation, and the stocks investors are watching. Here’s what moved the market this week.

Big News: Skydio Drops $3.5B on America

Skydio announced a $3.5 billion investment in US drone manufacturing over five years, including a factory five times bigger than its current space and 2,000 new jobs. Their SkyForge program — about $1 billion of the total — invites other suppliers to grow the US supply chain.

Why it matters. Around 90% of drone motor magnets come from China, and 99% of Li-ion batteries used in consumer electronics also come from China. It is a hard problem to solve. Skydio is attempting the same playbook many open hardware ecosystems use: open source the end demand specs and let an ecosystem bloom to competitively drive down costs.

Same week, Skydio raised $110M in Series F at a $4.4B valuation. The capital stack is getting fatter.

FAA Finally Moves

The FAA announced a long-delayed Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to restrict unauthorized drone operations over sensitive fixed-site facilities. It implements Section 2209 of the 2016 FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act. This is ten years in the making.

XTEND Grabs Europe Money

XTEND — currently merging with JFB to become XTEND AI Robotics — secured an $8.25M order from a European defense customer for autonomous drone systems. The contract includes a mix of indoor operational platforms and tactical strike systems. Delivery is expected during 2026.

Stocks: AVAV Bleeds, KTOS Holds, ONDS Surges

AeroVironment (AVAV)

Hurting. Down over 40% in three months. Lost a $1.7B Space Force contract. Cut full-year revenue guidance to $1.85–1.95B from $1.95–2B. Switchblade demand is still strong, but the BlueHalo integration is messy. Post-acquisition, gross margins have compressed from 39% to 22%.

Kratos (KTOS)

Still climbing. 2025 revenue was $1.35B, up 18.5%. Q4 revenue grew 21.9% to $345.1M. Fiscal 2026 guidance is $1.595–1.675B with a book-to-bill ratio of 1.3:1. The XQ-58 Valkyrie is now a formal Program of Record under a $231.5M Marine Corps contract.

Ondas (ONDS)

Rocketing. 2025 revenue exploded 605% to $50.7M. Management raised 2026 guidance to at least $375M on the strength of drone-in-a-box and counter-UAS deployments.

XPONENTIAL Next Week

Detroit, May 11–14. The Defense Technologies Zone will showcase how uncrewed systems are being integrated into the national security arsenal. Watch for announcements.

Quick Hits

Counter-UAS components. A $5M+ order was placed this week for US-made counter-UAS interceptor components — a continued move away from foreign hardware.

Canada’s MINERVA Initiative. The 3rd Canadian Division plans to grow its drone fleet by over 1,000% by 2027.

Beijing bans consumer drone sales. An awkward moment for DJI’s home market.

DJI Lito launch. DJI launched the Lito X1 and Lito 1 — Mini series successors — but US buyers are blocked under the FCC foreign drone ban.

Avalanche drones. AVSS in Canada wrapped real-world testing of drones dropping explosives to trigger controlled avalanches.

Bottom Line

The domestic supply chain push is real. Skydio is writing big checks. AVAV stumbles while KTOS and ONDS run. The FAA is finally moving. And there’s a big trade show next week.

The Pentagon details a $55 billion Defense Autonomous Warfare Group request — a 24,070% increase from the prior year. Skydio raises a $110 million Series F at a $4.4 billion valuation in the same week it commits $3.5 billion to U.S. manufacturing. AEVEX doubles in two trading sessions after its NYSE debut. And the Department of War walks Congress through how a September 2025 exercise rewrote U.S. counter-drone strategy. What investors need to know this week.

April closed with the sequence of events that turned the $1.5 trillion budget headline of three weeks ago into hard, programmatic line items. The Pentagon comptroller’s office walked reporters through a $55 billion ask for a single autonomous warfare office that had $225.9 million the year before. Skydio raised $110 million at a $4.4 billion valuation while announcing a $3.5 billion U.S. factory expansion in the same news cycle. AEVEX listed on the New York Stock Exchange at $20 and traded at $40 within forty-eight hours. Anduril’s Fury combat drone went hands-on with a U.S. Air Force operational unit at Edwards. Ondas’s freshly merged defense business deployed to Modern Day Marine in Washington with a $457 million pro forma backlog under its arm. And the Department of War began publicly explaining how an Eglin Air Force Base exercise modeled on Ukraine’s spiderweb attack reset its entire counter-drone strategy. Here’s the breakdown.

The Pentagon Details Its $55 Billion DAWG Request

The Department of War walked through the details of its FY27 autonomous systems request this week, and the scale of the increase makes the prior year’s spending look like a placeholder. The Defense Autonomous Warfare Group — the office now absorbing the Biden-era Replicator initiative — is asking for $54.6 billion in research and development funding, up from $225.9 million in FY26. That is a 24,070% year-over-year increase routed through one office. The request splits $1 billion into the base budget and $53.6 billion into the reconciliation pot the administration is pushing through Congress alongside the appropriations process.

Total Pentagon drone and counter-drone spending in the FY27 ask exceeds $70 billion when DAWG is combined with the $21 billion line for counter-UAS munitions, directed energy, and collaborative combat aircraft, and the $53.6 billion for autonomy, drone platforms, and contested logistics. War Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the package before Congress on Thursday, April 30, in what is now the largest single-year drone budget request in U.S. history. The administration has framed this as a doctrinal pivot toward manned-unmanned teaming and away from a force structure built around small numbers of expensive platforms.

The number that matters for industry isn’t the headline $55 billion. It’s the structure. DAWG is being positioned as a rapid-acquisition pathfinder — the office identifying technology, integrating it, and pulling it through a procurement system designed to operate in weeks rather than years. The companies that will benefit are the ones already in production with NDAA-compliant hardware and the manufacturing footprint to scale on contact. The defense primes still write the bid documents, but the dollars are flowing toward the firms that can actually deliver fielded systems in twelve months. That distinction is now the central question of the FY27 budget cycle.

Skydio Stacks Capital: $110 Million Series F and a $3.5 Billion Factory Plan

Skydio announced a $110 million Series F on Thursday, April 23, at a $4.4 billion post-money valuation, with CEO Adam Bry framing the size of the round as the actual story. The round was oversubscribed. Existing investors wanted to put substantially more in. Bry turned them down because the company’s core business is generating hundreds of millions in annual revenue with unit economics strong enough to fund ongoing operations and forward bets internally. That posture — capital availability that exceeds capital need — is rare for a defense-tech hardware company at scale.

The financing was paired with a separate $3.5 billion commitment, announced Friday, April 24, to expand Skydio’s Hayward, California manufacturing campus to roughly five times its current size over the next five years. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr and White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Michael Kratsios were on hand at the Fairfax County Police Department to frame the announcement as a domestic industrial-base story rather than a single-company milestone. Skydio is planning to triple production in 2026 to keep up with the U.S. Army’s $52 million order for nearly 3,000 X10D drones, the largest single-vendor small UAS contract in U.S. military history when it was placed in March.

The structural setup here is what gives the announcement its weight. The FCC’s December 2025 deadline that landed DJI on the Covered List has effectively closed the U.S. government and critical-infrastructure markets to Chinese hardware. Skydio’s X10 retails between $16,000 and $25,000 — a multiple of comparable DJI thermal platforms — but state and federal procurement is no longer pricing those drones against DJI. They are pricing against other NDAA-compliant alternatives, where Skydio sets the bar. The dual capital announcement is what it looks like when a company stops needing outside money and starts setting the terms of an entire procurement category.

AEVEX Doubles in Two Days After NYSE Debut

AEVEX Aerospace listed on the New York Stock Exchange under ticker AVEX on Friday, April 17, raising $320 million by selling 16 million shares at a $20 IPO price — the top of its $18 to $21 marketed range. Shares opened at $23.01, giving the company a $2.57 billion opening valuation. By Monday, April 20, the stock had traded as high as $40.25, more than doubling from the IPO price in the first two trading sessions. The book was oversubscribed several times over, and the listing now stands as the most successful pure-play military drone IPO of the post-Ukraine cycle.

AEVEX is the manufacturer of Phoenix Ghost, the loitering munition the U.S. has been supplying to Ukraine since 2022. That production track record is the single most important variable in how institutional investors are pricing the listing. The market has spent eighteen months separating drone companies that ship combat-proven hardware from drone companies that pitch combat-proven autonomy stacks. The capital is flowing decisively toward the first category, and AEVEX is the cleanest small-cap expression of that thesis to come public this year. The Aevex listing also opens up secondary-comp pricing for every other drone IPO in the queue.

The concentration risk is the part of the AEVEX story the market is currently choosing to discount rather than ignore. The company derives roughly 78% of revenue from U.S. government contracts. Madison Dearborn, the private equity sponsor, retains roughly 79% of voting control post-IPO. That structure means common shareholders are riding a single customer concentration on one side and a single controlling shareholder on the other. The post-IPO lockup expiration calendar and the first full quarter of public-company earnings will arrive at roughly the same time the FY27 budget gets debated, and that intersection is where AVEX’s price discovery will actually happen.

Anduril’s YFQ-44A Goes Hands-On at Edwards

The U.S. Air Force’s Experimental Operations Unit at Edwards Air Force Base conducted hands-on testing of Anduril’s YFQ-44A Fury aircraft last week, marking the first time an operational Air Force unit has put hands on the Collaborative Combat Aircraft. The unit launched, recovered, and turned the aircraft. It conducted pre-flight and post-flight checks, weapons loading, and direct tasking during taxi and flight. Critically, the testing was conducted without an operator in the loop with a stick and throttle. The autonomy stack ran the aircraft, and the EOU ran the autonomy stack.

Fury is Anduril’s entrant for the Collaborative Combat Aircraft program — the Air Force’s drone-wingman effort designed to fly alongside crewed F-22, F-35, and the F-47 next-generation fighter. The service has stated it wants a fleet of at least 1,000 CCAs. Anduril is competing with General Atomics, whose ground testing began in May 2025, and Northrop Grumman, whose Talon UAS was designated YFQ-48A in late December. A production decision between the prototypes is expected this year, with the Air Force retaining the option to carry one or more vendors into the production phase.

The EOU test is doctrinally more significant than another flight-test milestone. Putting an operational unit on the airframe — rather than test pilots, contractor engineers, or the original program office — is the step where Air Force institutional knowledge actually starts to develop. It is the move from “this aircraft can fly” to “this aircraft can be operated by the people who will operate it in combat.” The Air Force is signaling that the CCA program has cleared the prototype-validation hurdle and is now in the experiment-with-doctrine phase, which is the phase that determines what the production order actually looks like.

Ondas Brings $457 Million in Backlog to Modern Day Marine

Ondas Holdings deployed its newly merged Mistral defense business to Modern Day Marine in Washington, D.C., this week, the symposium running April 28 through April 30. The Ondas-Mistral combination — a $175 million all-stock deal that closed earlier in April — added $264 million in contracted backlog to the parent and lifted Ondas’s pro forma backlog to $457 million as of March 31. The deal also gave Ondas direct access to U.S. Army and Special Operations contract vehicles, including Mistral’s $982 million Army Lethal Unmanned System IDIQ and a $73.6 million U.S. Special Operations Command program.

Mistral arrived at Modern Day Marine pitching battlefield-ready tactical UAS and counter-UAS hardware for unit-level deployment. The combined company now has a Nottingham, Maryland integration facility, a 90,000-square-foot Drone Factory 01 in Huntsville, Alabama, and the Optimus platform on the Defense Contract Management Agency’s Blue List of NDAA-compliant approved systems. The structural pivot — from a wireless networking specialist to a Tier-1 defense prime contractor with onshore manufacturing — happened in roughly forty-five days. Few public-company transformations move that quickly.

The market has already priced part of the move. ONDS is up 16% in April and on track for its strongest month of 2026 heading into Thursday’s close. The first quarter results land on May 14 and will provide the first public look at how the combined revenue picture is shaping up. The setup is asymmetric: a new product showcase, a 16% monthly move, a $457 million backlog the Street has not yet stress-tested against execution, and a Hegseth Pentagon now writing $54 billion checks for exactly the platforms in Mistral’s IDIQ vehicles. The catalysts are stacked.

The Pentagon Operationalizes the Spiderweb Lesson

Brig. Gen. Matt Ross, the leader of Joint Interagency Task Force 401, walked reporters at the Sea-Air-Space conference through how a September 2025 exercise at Eglin Air Force Base reset U.S. counter-drone priorities. In Operation Clear Horizon, members of the 10th Special Forces Group played the adversary, replicating Ukraine’s spiderweb attack against Russia using small commercial drones, frequency-hopping radios, directional antennas, fiber-optic-controlled FPVs, and LTE-cellular drones launched from Colorado against targets in Florida. They flew Group 1 through Group 3 platforms across the full size envelope. The defenders were counter-drone troops drawn from across the U.S. military, trained for one week on technology the Department has spent billions of dollars developing.

Operation Clear Horizon is the unclassified origin story for the FY27 counter-drone request. JIATF-401 has now committed more than $600 million in unmanned-system defenses for Operation Epic Fury and stateside protection, including a $20 million southern-border package and counter-drone funding flowing to eleven cities supporting the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The Department’s posture has shifted from one in which counter-drone was a niche capability layered on top of conventional air defense to one in which counter-drone is the air defense priority — at the border, at airbases, and at the World Cup venues.

The operational case the Department is making is direct: the threat already crossed onto U.S. soil. Multiple unauthorized drone incursions have been recorded at Barksdale Air Force Base, the New Jersey incursion cluster from 2024 was never resolved, and the FBI is now investigating the theft of more than a dozen agricultural drones in New Jersey. The $20 billion-plus counter-UAS market is not a forecast anymore. It’s the floor. The September 2025 exercise told the Department what it needed to buy. The FY27 request is the Department buying it.

Drone Stocks Making Moves

The drone equity tape this week reflected the same theme running through every story in this post: capital is flowing toward the companies that can deliver fielded systems and execute against the FY27 budget on day one.

AeroVironment (AVAV) is the bellwether and trades around $245 after a sharp pullback from January highs but is still up 38% over the past year. The company is integrating its BlueHalo acquisition while ramping Switchblade 300 and 600 production toward 1,200 units per month, sitting on a $1.4 billion funded backlog, and standing up a Salt Lake City facility expected to triple manufacturing capacity by late 2026. Wall Street remains bullish on the underlying story even with the post-acquisition margin pressure: Needham reissued its buy with a $400 price target, BTIG holds a $415 target, and the consensus thesis is that a successful BlueHalo integration plus FY27 budget tailwinds set up a generational reacceleration. Q4 FY2026 earnings are the next catalyst.

Kratos Defense (KTOS) reports Q1 2026 results after the close on Wednesday, May 6, and the setup heading in is constructive. Jefferies reissued a buy with an $85 price target in early April, the stock popped 10% on that call, and Kratos was just added to the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The high-speed jet drone franchise — Valkyrie, Mako, MQM-178 — is positioned for direct DAWG procurement participation as the Pentagon scales attritable air vehicles. The earnings print is the test of whether bookings are inflecting on the FY27 commentary or whether the upgrade was a positioning trade.

Red Cat Holdings (RCAT) reports Q1 on Thursday, May 7. The company is ramping Black Widow production toward 1,000 units per month in the first half of 2026, opened its maritime USV factory in Georgia last quarter, and has a Kyiv office for direct engagement with Ukrainian defense stakeholders. The Drone Dominance Program — with the Army eyeing procurement of up to 350,000 FPV drones — is RCAT’s central catalyst, and it now lines up directly with the DAWG line items being walked through Congress.

Ondas Holdings (ONDS) rose 16% in April on the Mistral closing and the Modern Day Marine deployment, with Q1 results scheduled for May 14. Needham holds a $23 target and Maxim Group is at $22, both citing the post-merger backlog and the IDIQ exposure. Pro forma backlog of $457 million as of March 31 is the number the Street is grading against execution.

AEVEX (AVEX) opened public trading at $23.01 on April 17 and traded as high as $40.25 by April 20, doubling in two sessions on a $2.57 billion debut valuation. Phoenix Ghost is the production franchise. Lockup expiration and the first earnings print are the open questions.

Karman Holdings (KRMN) and Amprius Technologies (AMPX) round out the parts-and-components beneficiaries of the FY27 surge. Karman makes launchers for autonomous systems including drones, and Amprius manufactures the high-density batteries used in long-range drone strike platforms. Needham set a $125 target on Karman implying 50% upside, and a $20 target on Amprius implying 20% upside, citing the broadening of FY27 dollars across the full drone supply chain rather than just the platform OEMs.

The Bottom Line

A 24,070% year-over-year increase for the Pentagon office now running U.S. autonomous warfare procurement. A $54 billion drone budget and a $21 billion counter-drone budget moving through reconciliation and appropriations in parallel. Skydio raising a $110 million Series F at a $4.4 billion valuation while turning capital away. Skydio committing $3.5 billion to a five-fold expansion of its Hayward factory. AEVEX going public at $20 and trading at $40 inside forty-eight hours. Anduril’s Fury aircraft cleared for hands-on operation by an Air Force operational unit. Ondas converting a $175 million acquisition into a $457 million backlog and a Modern Day Marine showcase in forty-five days. The Pentagon publicly explaining that a Ukrainian-style drone attack rehearsed on a Florida airfield is what set the FY27 counter-drone priorities. And a Hegseth Pentagon defending the largest single-year drone budget request in U.S. history before Congress on Thursday. The capital, the contracts, the manufacturing, and the doctrine are all moving at the same speed at the same time.

$DRNZ, the REX Drone ETF, seeks to track the VettaFi Drone Index, providing exposure across the full drone ecosystem: combat, surveillance, logistics, commercial, and counter-drone.

Rheinmetall signs a framework agreement worth billions of euros for the FV-014 autonomous loitering munition, the largest European drone deal of the year. The U.S. Navy selects Shield AI to compete for up to $800 million in contractor-operated ISR using V-BAT, with AeroVironment, Insitu, and Textron on the same vehicle. AeroVironment lands the Army’s Medium Range Reconnaissance production contract for VAPOR CLE. Joint Interagency Task Force 401 reveals it quietly replicated Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb attack on a U.S. airfield, and rewrote the counter-drone playbook because of it. DJI puts a $1.5 billion price tag on the FCC’s Covered List. What investors need to know this week.

The week the Pentagon’s $1.5 trillion fiscal 2027 budget actually dropped was also the week the drone sector’s operational story kept pace with the appropriations story. Rheinmetall signed the largest European loitering munition deal of the cycle on Wednesday, a framework contract worth billions of euros with the Bundeswehr for the FV-014, fully EU-manufactured, with a first €300 million call-off booked in April. On the U.S. side, the Navy quietly selected Shield AI to compete on an $800 million V-BAT ISR vehicle alongside AeroVironment, Insitu, and Textron, which is the clearest signal yet that contractor-owned, contractor-operated ISR is becoming a standard Navy procurement model. AeroVironment won the Army’s Medium Range Reconnaissance production contract for VAPOR CLE, its all-electric VTOL platform. The Pentagon’s counter-drone clearinghouse JIATF 401 disclosed it had replicated Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb attack on a U.S. airfield and rebuilt its priorities around what the exercise revealed. And DJI told the Ninth Circuit the FCC’s Covered List inclusion is costing it $1.5 billion and 25 product launches in 2026 alone: tightening the domestic manufacturing vacuum every U.S. drone maker is sprinting to fill. Here’s the breakdown.

Rheinmetall Signs a Multi-Billion-Euro FV-014 Framework

On Wednesday in Koblenz, Rheinmetall signed a framework agreement with the Bundeswehr for the FV-014 autonomous loitering munition. This is a system combining reconnaissance and precision strike in a single airframe. The framework is worth billions of euros over its life. The first call-off, booked in April 2026, is approximately €300 million gross. The agreement optionally extends to a five-figure number of FV-014 units, meaning tens of thousands of autonomous recce-and-strike drones across the program’s duration. Deliveries begin in the first half of 2027 following qualification starting in Q2 2026. The system carries a 100-kilometer range and is manufactured entirely within the European Union.

The FV-014 is the clearest European answer to Ukraine’s battlefield demand signal. Three years of war established that a single platform capable of loitering, identifying, and striking is operationally cheaper and more responsive than cueing a separate strike asset from a separate command chain. Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger described the system as enabling the Bundeswehr to “protect its own forces and engage critical targets in a fast, controlled and effective manner” and noted industrial-scale production begins almost immediately. The speed from requirement to signed contract is itself the story: Germany’s legacy procurement cycle measured drone acquisition in years. The FV-014 framework compressed that to a single budget cycle.

The implication for the sector is significant. Rheinmetall is the largest defense contractor in continental Europe and the reference point for what the European procurement base will sign. A multi-billion-euro autonomous strike framework with tens of thousands of unit options is Europe’s version of the Pentagon’s DAWG surge. Allied militaries are building autonomous recce-strike capacity as a permanent component of ground force doctrine. Every publicly traded drone name with allied export exposure or NATO procurement alignment benefits from the validation that the FV-014 framework provides. The autonomous loitering munition category is no longer a category with one or two serious buyers. It is the default European ground force requirement.

Shield AI Wins a Seat at the Navy’s $800M V-BAT ISR Table

On April 20, the U.S. Navy selected Shield AI to compete for up to $800 million in contractor-owned, contractor-operated intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance task orders using the V-BAT vertical-takeoff-and-landing drone. Shield AI is competing on the same vehicle alongside AeroVironment, Insitu, and Textron — the four companies now positioned as the Navy’s primary COCO ISR providers. V-BAT is a Group 3 VTOL platform with ducted-fan propulsion, more than 12 hours of endurance, and a heavy-fuel engine. It is already in active service with the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Marine Corps, the Royal Netherlands Navy, the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force, and the European border agency Frontex.

The contracting mechanism matters more than the ceiling. Contractor-owned, contractor-operated means industry partners retain ownership of the airframes and provide the operational crews. The Navy just pays for ISR outputs rather than buying a fleet. Rather than waiting through a multi-year acquisition cycle for a government-owned platform, the Navy can field persistent ISR almost immediately, scale the fleet based on operational demand, and shift financial risk to industry. COCO converts capital expenditure into service revenue. This is the procurement equivalent of the cloud-computing model migrating from on-premises hardware to subscription services.

For the public-market drone names on the same vehicle, the read-through is material. AeroVironment already operates JUMP 20-X in a COCO arrangement for the Navy under a February 2026 award. Shield AI’s V-BAT, while privately held, is the benchmark Group 3 VTOL in the Navy’s operational stack. This has already resulted in 100,000-plus pounds of narcotics interdicted in the Caribbean and Pacific, hundreds of targeting missions in Ukraine operating through GPS jamming and contested communications. A Navy that wants COCO ISR at scale and has four qualified industry partners competing for every task order has just industrialized the small-boat aviation model into an unmanned paradigm. The addressable market for Group 3 VTOL manufacturers is being reshaped by this procurement model, not just by the FY27 dollar commitments.

AeroVironment Wins the Army’s Medium Range Reconnaissance Production Contract

AeroVironment announced Monday that it won a $14.6 million U.S. Army production contract for VAPOR Compact Long Endurance under the Company-Level Directed Requirement Small Uncrewed Aircraft System program, Tranche 2. The award supports the Army’s Medium Range Reconnaissance initiative. One of the service’s active unmanned systems procurements focused on fielding commercially available drone systems to Brigade Combat Teams at the company level. VAPOR CLE is AV’s all-electric VTOL platform, built with modular payload architecture supporting up to 24 pounds of sensors, with approximately two hours of endurance per mission.

VAPOR CLE’s operational profile addresses a specific Army requirement that has been under-served by legacy sUAS. Hand-launched Group 1 platforms lack endurance. Group 4-5 MALE aircraft require runways, launchers, and logistics tails the brigade level cannot support. VAPOR fills the gap: electric, VTOL, modular payload, runway-independent. The Medium Range Reconnaissance program is structurally designed to distribute these aircraft to Brigade Combat Teams rather than hold them at division or corps level. This is a doctrinal shift that moves drone capability forward on the battlefield rather than backward toward command echelons. The $14.6 million dollar value is modest. The program positioning is not.

AVAV stock traded lower following the contract announcement, leaving shares down roughly 23% year-to-date at approximately $197. The company also introduced MAYHEM 10, its next-generation launched-effects platform, at AAAA 2026 on April 15, and appointed a new COO and incoming CFO within the same week. The Street’s read on AVAV remains a multiple compression debate rather than a backlog problem. The Army keeps buying. VAPOR, JUMP 20-X, Switchblade, and now MAYHEM 10 sit inside the fastest-growing procurement line in the DoD. Whether that converts into stock performance depends on execution against the refreshed leadership team and on whether the FY27 budget details tighten revenue visibility enough to support re-rating. The company’s next earnings cycle is the next hard checkpoint.

JIATF 401 Replicates Operation Spiderweb — and Rewrites the Counter-Drone Playbook

Defense One reported Thursday that Joint Interagency Task Force 401, the Pentagon’s counter-drone clearinghouse, staged a classified exercise last September at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida that replicated Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb attack on a U.S. airfield. Members of the 10th Special Forces Group simulated a drone assault mirroring the Ukrainian operation that destroyed a third of Russia’s strategic aviation fleet in June 2025. The defenders were counter-drone troops from across the U.S. military, trained for a full week on the most advanced counter-UAS technology the Pentagon has fielded. The exercise, dubbed Operation Clear Horizon, produced findings that reshaped JIATF 401’s acquisition priorities.

Brigadier General Matt Ross, who leads JIATF 401, told Defense One the exercise “helped us develop our priorities.” The takeaway, in operational terms: the counter-drone stack the U.S. military has been buying for years does not yet solve the Spiderweb attack vector. Spiderweb was not a technological novelty. It was a logistical and targeting novelty — 150 combat FPV drones smuggled across borders, placed in trucks near static Russian aviation targets, launched in coordinated waves. Ukraine’s Security Service executed the attack with drones costing a fraction of what the destroyed Russian bombers were worth. The cost asymmetry problem that Ukraine has been exporting to the rest of the world now has an American threat-model analog.

JIATF 401 has responded by accelerating the counter-drone marketplace it stood up earlier in 2026 and by shifting funding toward the specific capability gaps Clear Horizon revealed. The task force committed $100 million for FIFA World Cup security focused on mobile counter-drone technology protecting stadiums and fan zones across 11 U.S. cities and nine states. It has ordered the Perennial Autonomy Bumblebee V2 kinetic interceptor at $5.2 million for immediate fielding. It has selected DroneHunter F700 as its first Replicator 2 acquisition. And it is running weekly training exercises at Fort Belvoir with the 3rd Infantry Regiment on the Bumblebee V1 platform. The $20 billion-plus counter-UAS market is no longer a forecast. It is the buying curve of a Pentagon that just discovered its existing counter-drone stack cannot stop a Spiderweb attack.

DJI Tells the Ninth Circuit the FCC Is Costing It $1.5 Billion

On April 15, DJI filed a brief with the Ninth Circuit putting specific numbers on the damages from the FCC’s Covered List inclusion. The filing claims the company has lost or will lose 25 product launches in the U.S. market in 2026, with total commercial damages exceeding $1.5 billion for the year alone. The December 23, 2025 Covered List deadline, combined with the FCC’s ongoing authorization freeze on new DJI products, has effectively removed the world’s largest consumer and commercial drone manufacturer from the U.S. market at the production-authorization layer. The Department of War filed a parallel memo urging the FCC to reject DJI’s petition entirely, referencing a classified annex submitted to Congress in early April.

The commercial implications of the DJI freeze are not abstract. Blue UAS-compliant alternatives cost 8 to 14 times more than the DJI systems they replace. The domestic manufacturing base for mid-market commercial drones is still ramping. Every week DJI products cannot be authorized for U.S. import is a week the commercial, public safety, agricultural, and infrastructure sectors rely on a narrower set of NDAA-compliant vendors to meet demand. Unusual Machines, Red Cat, AeroVironment, BRINC, Skydio, and the broader Blue List ecosystem are the direct beneficiaries of the production vacuum the FCC and DoD are enforcing.

DJI also launched the Lito 1 and Lito X1 globally on April 23. These are a product line that may or may not ever reach the U.S. market depending on the Ninth Circuit’s ruling. The bifurcation is becoming the reference point for global drone supply chains: DJI serves Europe, Asia, Latin America, and parts of the Middle East at scale. The U.S. market becomes a domestic-only procurement environment for anything touching government infrastructure, public safety, or defense. Also, it is increasingly true for broad commercial categories as well. The regulatory moat around U.S. drone manufacturers is widening in real time.

Echodyne Adds a USAF Counter-UAS Contract

On April 21, Echodyne and Trust Automation were awarded a USAF counter-UAS contract expanding Echodyne’s radar systems across Air Force base protection programs. Echodyne’s EchoGuard and EchoShield 4D radars have been integrated into counter-drone architectures at U.S. military installations, at the southern border, and in allied deployments. The Trust Automation partnership adds control-system integration to the sensor stack, creating a fuller C-UAS solution that Air Force installation commanders can deploy without building bespoke integrations.

The contract is modest in dollar terms but meaningful in what it reinforces: the counter-drone procurement market is increasingly built on radar-plus-effector combinations rather than standalone detection systems. The Pentagon’s “Harden, Obscure, Perimeter” doctrine, published earlier in the year by JIATF 401, places physical infrastructure defense and sensor layering ahead of reliance on any single counter-UAS platform. Every radar vendor with demonstrated integration flexibility (Echodyne, SRC, Hensoldt, Thales) benefits from that doctrinal shift. So does every company building the effectors that attach to the detection layer, from kinetic interceptors to electronic warfare packages to directed-energy systems.

Drone Stocks Making Moves

The week’s broader sector rotation followed through on the FY27 budget enthusiasm, with selective leadership from names reporting concrete operational progress.

AeroVironment (AVAV) won the $14.6 million Army VAPOR CLE production contract on April 20, introduced MAYHEM 10 on April 15, and refreshed its senior ranks with a new COO from Raytheon and an incoming CFO. Shares sit near $197, down roughly 23% year-to-date despite a 36.8% one-year return. The stock is trading as a multiple-compression debate: Army contract cadence, backlog growth, and product launches continue to accelerate while the Street resets forward sales assumptions. The Navy’s $800 million V-BAT COCO selection adds AV to a competitive vehicle where it is already operating JUMP 20-X under a separate arrangement. The next operational checkpoint is fiscal year-end earnings.

Red Cat Holdings (RCAT) closed April 21 at approximately $12.72 after a recent 25% drawdown from early-April highs. The stock remains up meaningfully year-to-date on the back of Q4 2025 revenue growth of roughly 1,842% year-over-year, the April 2 NATO Black Widow order facilitated by the NATO Support and Procurement Agency, the March 30 Apium Swarm Robotics acquisition, and the March 30 Ukraine Spetstechnoexport MOU. Cash on hand is $167.9 million. Manufacturing capacity reached 254,000 square feet, with Black Widow production ramping toward 1,000 units per month and USV targets of 100 units at $700,000 each through Blue Ops in 2026. Q1 2026 earnings release is scheduled for May 7. This is the first hard conversion checkpoint for the post-cluster narrative.

Kratos Defense (KTOS) remains up approximately 72% year-to-date following its April 8 announcement of a $446.8 million Space Systems Command Other Transaction Agreement for the Resilient Missile Warning and Tracking Ground Management and Integration program. The Valkyrie loyal-wingman program, selected by the Marine Corps for its first Collaborative Combat Aircraft in January alongside Northrop Grumman, sits directly inside the FY27 budget’s CCA line. KTOS is one of the clear structural beneficiaries of the autonomous-systems funding surge, with exposure across unmanned aircraft, space, and Golden Dome architecture layers.

Ondas Holdings (ONDS) is running a $65.3 million backlog, up 180% from November, against FY26 revenue guidance of $170-180 million. Airobotics’ $20 million initial purchase order from March as prime contractor on the multi-year national autonomous border protection program anchors the demand signal. Ondas is up 11% year-to-date and more than 450% over the trailing twelve months. The Iron Drone Raider counter-UAS line and Sentrycs cyber-over-RF capability extend ONDS directly into the counter-drone marketplace that JIATF 401 is accelerating.

Unusual Machines (UMAC) continues scaling NDAA-compliant motor production at its Orlando facility, moving from roughly 15,000 motors monthly toward a doubling target through second and third shifts. Daily production is expected to rise from approximately 700 to 1,500 parts. Management has signaled product-line expansion into headsets, batteries, and frames through 2026-2027. More than half of the Drone Dominance Gauntlet 1 program winners are UMAC customers: a direct positioning for the FY27 domestic drone manufacturing line items and a direct beneficiary of every week DJI remains locked out of U.S. import authorization.

DroneShield (ASX: DRO) announced an A$6.2 million Asia-Pacific military contract for its counter-drone systems, expected to deliver and convert to cash in 2026. The order was facilitated through a regional reseller that has previously closed 14 standalone contracts totaling more than A$48 million across the past two years. DroneShield’s pipeline entering FY26 stood at approximately A$1.2 billion in disclosed opportunity. The company is the clearest publicly traded pure-play counter-drone name listed on a major exchange and is a direct beneficiary of the JIATF 401 marketplace expansion and the broader global counter-UAS funding surge.

The Bottom Line

Rheinmetall booking a multi-billion-euro framework for the FV-014 autonomous loitering munition, with tens of thousands of unit options and a €300 million first call-off. Shield AI selected by the U.S. Navy to compete on an $800 million V-BAT ISR vehicle alongside AeroVironment, Insitu, and Textron. AeroVironment winning the Army’s Medium Range Reconnaissance production contract for VAPOR CLE at $14.6 million. JIATF 401 revealing it replicated Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb attack on a U.S. airfield and rewrote its counter-drone priorities around what it found. DJI telling the Ninth Circuit the FCC is costing it $1.5 billion and 25 product launches in 2026 alone. Echodyne adding a USAF counter-UAS contract through its Trust Automation partnership. DroneShield closing an A$6.2 million Asia-Pacific military order. Red Cat entering Q1 earnings season with a $167.9 million cash position, 254,000 square feet of manufacturing, and a NATO Black Widow order on the books. This is a sector where the procurement mechanics are being rewritten as quickly as the dollar commitments. The weeks that follow the FY27 budget release will reveal how fast those dollars convert into signed contracts.

Join us live 4/28 @ 1pm Eastern: Fly into Q2 with us for our drone market update and earnings preview webinar. Webinar Registration — Zoom »

The U.S. Air Force signs a $270 million deal for long-endurance solar drones routed through Central Command. The UK commits £752 million for 120,000 drones bound for Ukraine, which is the largest single-country commitment of the war. Germany and Ukraine ink a €4 billion joint drone production pact. Unidentified drones overfly the Washington Army base housing the Secretaries of State and War. And AeroVironment lines up a new CFO while Anduril clears another task order under its $20 billion enterprise contract. What investors need to know this week.

The drone sector delivered another week where the commercial, the combat, and the domestic converged. A solar-powered scout drone already flying under U.S. Special Forces landed a quarter-billion-dollar Air Force deal tied directly to Operation Epic Fury. Ukraine’s wartime drone expertise became the organizing principle of Europe’s new defense industrial base. Unidentified drones kept showing up over Tier-1 U.S. installations. This time over the homes of two cabinet secretaries during an active war! And capital markets absorbed all of it: AVAV retook $194 on Freedom Eagle momentum, ONDS popped 6%, RCAT printed fresh all-time highs, and UMAC ran nearly 8% on NDAA-compliant component demand. Here’s the breakdown.

Air Force Inks $270M Deal for Solar-Powered Scout Drones Feeding CENTCOM

The U.S. Air Force will purchase up to $270 million of Kraus Hamdani Aerospace K1000ULE long-endurance drones, with the contract routed through U.S. Air Forces Central. This is the CENTCOM component overseeing Operation Epic Fury, the joint U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran. The deal, disclosed April 14, was announced by the Emeryville, California-based manufacturer and has not yet posted on DoD contracts websites.

The K1000ULE is a two-person, man-packable, solar-powered fixed-wing drone built for extended loitering scout missions. It is already fielded in limited quantities with U.S. Army Special Forces and the 1st Multi-Domain Task Force, and it flew in the Army’s Ivy Sting 4 exercise at Fort Carson in January. The platform’s appeal is simple: persistence without a logistics tail. Solar charging means it can stay airborne long enough to do intelligence and reconnaissance work that used to require a much larger, much more expensive aircraft.

The strategic signal here is larger than the dollar figure. Central Command, the theater actively conducting kinetic operations against Iran, is standing up lightweight, persistent, low-signature ISR at scale, and doing it with a venture-backed Silicon Valley firm rather than a legacy prime. This is the operational flywheel Pentagon leadership has been describing since December: a stable demand signal routing commercial drone innovation directly into the warfight. The K1000ULE deal is what that demand signal looks like in practice.

UK Commits £752 Million for 120,000 Drones to Ukraine — a Record Single Package

London announced a £752 million ($1 billion) package delivering 120,000 uncrewed air vehicles to Ukraine this year. This is the largest single-country drone commitment of the war. The deal was unveiled ahead of the April 15 Ukraine Defence Contact Group meeting in Berlin and routes production through three UK suppliers: Malloy Aeronautics, Tekever, and Windracers.

The three firms cover different parts of the kill chain. Malloy builds heavy-lift quadcopters for logistics and precision strike. Tekever produces the AR3 and AR5 ISR platforms already flying in Ukrainian service. Windracers makes the Ultra autonomous fixed-wing platform used for long-range cargo and swarming missions. Taken together, 120,000 UAVs spread across three tiers is roughly the scale of production output the entire pre-war European defense industry could absorb in a decade.

The procurement math has flipped. Ukraine’s armed forces are no longer buyers of last resort, they are the reference customer for every Western drone program. The UK package arrived the same week Germany signed a €4 billion defense partnership with Kyiv that includes joint drone production and Patriot replenishment. The European drone industrial base is being built around Ukrainian doctrine, Ukrainian software, and Ukrainian combat data. Every one of those 120,000 UAVs is a datapoint that private-market capital can underwrite against.

Germany-Ukraine Strategic Partnership Formalizes Joint Drone Production

On April 14, Chancellor Friedrich Merz and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a strategic defense partnership in Berlin covering €4 billion of equipment, joint drone production, and battlefield data sharing. Germany is financing a separate Ukraine-Raytheon contract for several hundred Patriot interceptors, and the two governments agreed to co-develop additional IRIS-T launchers through Diehl Defence.

The drone component is the structural piece. Germany gains direct access to Ukrainian platform designs, battlefield telemetry, and software stacks that have logged millions of combat hours against Russian electronic warfare. In exchange, Kyiv gets European capital, capacity, and supply-chain resilience for components that have become chokepoints under wartime conditions. The Quantum Frontline joint venture, Europe’s first fully automated production line for Ukrainian-designed drones, is the template.

This is doctrinal consolidation. For two years, Ukrainian drone production scaled inside Ukraine, with Ukrainian engineers, on Ukrainian soil and the world watched. Now the production template is being exported wholesale into NATO countries. Denmark is negotiating with Skyfall for local Vampire production at $8,500 per unit and up to 100,000 units per year. Finland and Slovakia have hosted Ukrainian firms since last fall. The center of gravity in Western drone manufacturing has moved east and is now being fed back west with allied money behind it.

Drones Overfly Washington Army Base Housing Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth

Between April 9 and April 11, unidentified drones were sighted over a Washington Army installation that houses the residences of Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. The sightings follow the March 9–15 incursions over Barksdale Air Force Base, home of the B-52 Stratofortress fleet and nuclear weapons storage facilities, where Security Forces logged multiple waves of 12–15 drones operating over the flight line with non-commercial signal characteristics, long-range control links, and active resistance to jamming.

The Barksdale profile was not hobbyist. Drones entered and exited the installation in patterns consistent with operators testing security response times. Lights on the aircraft suggested deliberate observation of base reaction cycles. A Northern Command spokesperson confirmed that the recently-fielded Flyaway Kit, the C-UAS system built around Anduril’s Lattice, engaged its jamming protocol against multiple incursions since the start of Operation Epic Fury. The command has not attributed the incursions to any specific adversary but has not ruled out foreign involvement.

The domestic drone threat is no longer a hypothesis. It is showing up, repeatedly, over nuclear bomber bases and over the homes of two cabinet secretaries during an active war. Every incursion that goes unattributed is a data point for adversary operators on where American sensors are thin and where jurisdictional seams, between the FAA, the Department of War, and DHS, prevent rapid kinetic response. This is the domestic demand side of the counter-drone trade. The $20 billion Anduril enterprise contract, the $95.9 million AeroVironment Freedom Eagle award, and NORTHCOM’s expanding flyaway kit deployments are all downstream of exactly this threat picture.

Anduril Lands Another Ghost-X Order as the $20B Enterprise Contract Starts Flowing

On April 7, the U.S. Army awarded Anduril Industries a $16.8 million firm-fixed-price contract for Ghost-X drone hardware paired with Trillium HD45LP day-and-night imaging payloads. The contract specifies both the airframe and the sensor package, which signals a shift in Army procurement: the service is no longer buying generic small drones and integrating sensors separately. It is buying integrated ISR systems off the shelf.

The Ghost-X is a vertical-takeoff, rotary-wing platform designed for extended-range reconnaissance. The Trillium HD45LP provides stabilized electro-optical and infrared imagery in a lightweight, low-power package. Together they form a turnkey intelligence package that can be deployed by a small team without specialized ground infrastructure.

This task order is one of the first concrete line items against the $20 billion ten-year enterprise contract the Army signed with Anduril on March 13. That framework consolidated more than 120 separate procurement actions into a single vehicle built around the Lattice software platform, with a stated goal of cutting administrative friction across the counter-UAS, C2, and interceptor portfolios. The $87 million Lattice C2 task order followed on March 16. The Ghost-X buy followed in early April. Expect task orders of this size to flow weekly as the framework scales. Lattice is becoming the operating system for U.S. drone defense.

The Pentagon Wants 300,000 Drones — And Is Writing the Procurement Rules to Get Them

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s recent remarks to industry framed the cost asymmetry problem with unusual directness: the U.S. cannot continue shooting down $5,000 drones with $2 million missiles and retain budgetary solvency. The Department of War’s response is a $1 billion industry program, to be released across four phases over two years beginning in early 2027, aimed at producing more than 300,000 small unmanned platforms.

The structural design of the program matters more than the headline number. The Pentagon is explicitly signaling a stable, multi-year demand curve, a procurement mechanism that mirrors how commercial companies raise capital and plan capacity. Hegseth’s team has described the approach as leveraging private capital against a stable demand signal, paired with flexible contracting built for commercial companies. That is venture-capital language applied to federal acquisition, and it is the language drone-industry CEOs have been asking the Pentagon to speak for the better part of a decade.

The Marine Corps is already moving on a similar plan to acquire 10,000 FPV drones this year with expanded training for off-the-shelf systems. Add the Air Force’s $30 million Beehive Industries contract for Frenzy jet engines under the Family of Affordable Mass Missiles program, which received $620 million in FY26 procurement and R&D funding and the picture becomes clear. The U.S. is not just buying drones. It is building a sovereign mass-production base for expendable airpower.

Drone Stocks Making Moves

This week’s stock action tracked the same themes driving the procurement data: counter-UAS demand, acquisition rollups, and capital rotating into any public name with direct exposure to the drone industrial base.

AeroVironment (AVAV) closed the week at $194.52 after Tuesday’s announcement that Sean Woodward will take over as Chief Financial Officer effective May 1. On April 15, the company confirmed its precision hardware will point the Artemis II laser communications link back to Earth, extending AVAV’s footprint into space systems. Despite the rough 3q26, Wall Street remains constructive: 24 buy ratings against 1 sell. Consensus fair-value narratives on the stock currently anchor near $280 against the current $194.52 print, reflecting a sizeable discount as the share price resets from its 52-week high of $417.86. The $95.9 million Freedom Eagle counter-drone missile contract, the $200 million ESAero acquisition closed in March, and the $4.1 billion BlueHalo integration now under the precision strike group have repositioned AVAV as one of the few public pure-plays with exposure across C-UAS, loitering munitions, and space.

Red Cat Holdings (RCAT) confirmed on April 16 that Q1 2026 earnings will be released after market close on Thursday, May 7. Shares have been printing all-time highs on the back of defense partnerships, fresh analyst price target raises citing the Middle East war as a demand catalyst, and continued progress on the Black Widow production ramp toward 1,000 units per month in the first half of 2026. Red Cat’s maritime USV factory in Georgia is now operational, and the company’s Kyiv office is active for direct engagement with Ukrainian defense stakeholders. Q1 will be the market’s first look at whether the backlog translates into revenue after a breakout 2025 that printed 1,985% quarterly revenue growth in Q4.

Ondas Holdings (ONDS) traded at $9.83, up 6.05% on the session. The Marlborough, Massachusetts-based firm is building a multi-domain ISR and counter-drone platform through its Ondas Autonomous Systems subsidiary, and its strategic relationships, including work with Palantir on data fusion, position it as the communications backbone for drone swarming operations in contested electromagnetic environments. ONDS is increasingly cited by sell-side analysts in the same breath as KTOS and RCAT when mapping the tactical-drone trade.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS) closed at $87.00, up 1.71%. The company reported $1.35 billion in 2025 full-year revenue and continues to develop the jet-powered XQ-58A Valkyrie as a Collaborative Combat Aircraft candidate, with a formal Program of Record now in place under a $231.5 million Marine Corps contract. With CCA Increment 2 contracts expected this year and nearly $1 billion in the FY27 budget request for production procurement, KTOS remains the highest-torque public exposure to autonomous wingman platforms.

Unusual Machines (UMAC) printed $16.45, up 7.80%. The company is the cleanest NDAA-compliant drone components pure-play on U.S. markets, building out domestic supply chains for motors and flight-control hardware at exactly the moment Congress is moving to lock Chinese-origin parts out of federally procured drones. The policy tailwind is structural. Every NDAA-compliant platform needs components that do not come through Shenzhen, and UMAC is positioned to be one of a handful of domestic names filling that gap.

The Bottom Line

A $270 million solar-drone contract routing through Central Command. 120,000 UAVs bound for Ukraine under a record UK commitment. Germany formalizing joint drone production with Kyiv at €4 billion of scope. Drones overflying the Washington residences of Rubio and Hegseth. Anduril clearing another Ghost-X task order under the $20 billion enterprise framework. The Pentagon writing procurement rules for 300,000 small drones backed by $1 billion of industry investment. AVAV adding a CFO and pointing hardware at Artemis II. RCAT printing all-time highs ahead of May 7 earnings. ONDS up 6% on counter-drone capital rotation. UMAC up nearly 8% on NDAA-compliant component demand. The capital, the contracts, and the combat deployments are all accelerating at the same time — and the domestic drone threat is no longer a line item on a threat briefing. It’s showing up over nuclear bomber bases and cabinet residences on American soil.

$DRNZ, the REX Drone ETF, seeks to track the VettaFi Drone Index, providing exposure across the full drone ecosystem: combat, surveillance, logistics, commercial, and counter-drone.

Key Highlights

March Distribution: 13.81% annualized (91.1% estimated Return of Capital)

Performance (3/1 – 3/31/26): ATCL: -3.15%  |  SPXT: -4.98%

Since Inception (2/18 – 3/31/26): ATCL: -2.89%  |  SPXT: -4.98%

Since Inception Beta to S&P 500 TR: ~0.80

Up Capture (March): 85.6% of S&P 500 TR Index

Down Capture (March): 76.1% of S&P 500 TR Index

Commentary

Structured product issuance remained elevated in Q1 2026, with equity-linked issuance reaching approximately $59B vs. $45B in Q1 2025 (+14% YoY). Autocallables remained the most widely used payoff structure, representing ~60% of issuance.

Equity markets experienced broad-based weakness in March, with increased volatility driven by geopolitical tensions, rate uncertainty, and growth concerns. The S&P 500 TR Index declined -4.98% during the month.

ATCL returned -3.15% in March, outperforming the S&P 500 TR Index and capturing approximately 63% of the market downside. This relative performance was primarily driven by the portfolio’s current positioning, with a weighted average mark-to-market level of 92.89%, contributing to lower equity sensitivity during the period, along with the ongoing accrual of coupon income within the portfolio.

Portfolio positioning remains constructive, with all positions currently above their coupon barriers, supporting full coupon eligibility across the portfolio.

ATCL paid its first distribution in March, with an annualized distribution rate of 13.81%, of which 91.1% was estimated as Return of Capital.

Portfolio Highlights

Performance Summary

March: 3/1 – 3/31/26  •  Since Inception: 2/18 – 3/31/26

Data as of 3/31/26. Source: Bloomberg. Daily total returns. Inception: February 18, 2026. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Important Information

The Fund enters into swap agreements with RBC to obtain exposure to the Bloomberg US Large Cap VolMax Autocallable Total Return Index. RBC is not an advisor, promoter, in any way affiliated with the Fund and has no responsibility for the Fund’s performance, marketing, or trading, or any responsibility regarding the suitability of the Fund as an investment.

Investing in the Fund involves a high degree of risk. As with any investment, there is a risk that you could lose all or a portion of your investment in the Fund.

An investor should carefully consider the Fund’s investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses before investing. The Fund’s prospectus and summary prospectus contain this and other information about REX Shares. To obtain the Fund’s prospectus and summary prospectus call 1-844-802-4004. The Fund’s prospectus and summary prospectus should be read carefully before investing.

THE FUND, TRUST, AND ADVISER ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE BLOOMBERG US LARGE CAP VOLMAX AUTOCALLABLE TOTAL RETURN INDEX, THE BLOOMBERG US LARGE CAP VOLMAX INDEX, THE BLOOMBERG US LARGE CAP TOTAL RETURN INDEX, OR BLOOMBERG LP.

Autocallable Structure Risk. The Fund’s returns are linked to a structured autocallable index, which may limit upside participation and expose investors to complex payoff patterns that differ from direct investments in the underlying securities.

Barrier Risk. If the underlying reference index breaches specified barrier levels, principal and income protections may be reduced or lost, potentially resulting in significant losses of invested capital.

Coupon/Contingent Income Risk. Coupon payments are contingent on barrier conditions being met and are not guaranteed; in unfavorable market environments, investors may receive little or no income.

Early Redemption Risk. Autocallable features can cause positions to be redeemed early in rising markets, forcing reinvestment at potentially lower yields and limiting participation in continued market gains.

Market Risk. The value of the Fund will fluctuate with overall market conditions and the performance of the underlying reference index, and investors could lose money, including principal.

Volatility Target Index Risk. The volatility-targeted reference index may underperform traditional equity indices because of its leverage caps, volatility adjustment mechanism, and embedded financing or cost overlays.

Active Management Risk. The Fund’s performance depends on the investment decisions and risk management techniques of the adviser, which may not achieve the intended results and could cause the Fund to underperform.

Liquidity Risk. Certain instruments, including derivatives referencing structured notes or indices, may become difficult or costly to trade, which can impact pricing, portfolio management, and the ability to meet redemptions.

Derivatives Risk. The Fund’s use of derivatives may magnify gains and losses, introduce leverage, and create exposure to valuation, correlation, and operational risks that can adversely affect performance.

Options Contracts Risk. Options can expire worthless, are sensitive to changes in volatility, time decay, and the price of the underlying asset, and may be less liquid than other securities.

New Fund Risk. Because the Fund is newly formed, it has a limited operating history and there can be no assurance that it will be successful in implementing its investment strategy.

Underlying Reference Index and Volatility Targeting Risk. Performance depends on the Bloomberg US Large Cap VolMax Index (or any successor index), which applies volatility targeting, financing charges and other adjustments that may cause it to underperform the underlying equity index.

Equity Market Risk. The value of the Fund may fluctuate in response to stock market moves, and equity markets can decline rapidly and unpredictably.

Debt Securities and U.S. Treasury Risk. Investments in U.S. Treasuries and other debt used as collateral are subject to interest-rate, credit, prepayment and liquidity risk, which can negatively impact the Fund.

Non-Diversification Risk. As a non-diversified fund, the Fund may invest a larger portion of its assets in fewer issuers or strategies, increasing the impact of any single position or market event on performance.

Concentration Risk. To the extent the Fund concentrates its investments in specific sectors, asset classes, or strategies, it is more vulnerable to conditions and events that adversely affect those areas.

Counterparty Risk. The Fund is exposed to the creditworthiness of swap, options, and other transaction counterparties, and could incur losses if a counterparty fails to meet its obligations.

Cyber Security Risk. The Fund and its service providers may be adversely affected by cyber-attacks or other information security events that could result in financial loss, business disruption, or unauthorized access to confidential information.

Funds distributed by: Foreside Fund Services, LLC, not affiliated with Rex Shares, LLC, or its affiliates.