The Drone Market This Week: 100% Tariffs on Imported Drones, CENTCOM’s Attack Drone Task Force, and Uber Buys Into Zipline

President Trump’s Section 232 proclamation put tariffs of 25% to 100% on imported drones and components, with allied supply chains capped at lower rates and the highest rates reserved for the exact product categories Chinese manufacturers dominate. Drone stocks ripped. Unusual Machines closed up 24.6% and hit a 52-week high. That was the industrial policy story. The military operational story ran alongside it and was arguably louder: CENTCOM created a new multinational one-way attack drone unit, the Washington Post reported the U.S. has lost roughly a quarter of its MQ-9 Reaper fleet in the Iran war, and NATO jets downed drones over Latvia and Romania while the head of NORTHCOM told anyone listening that American bases still cannot defend themselves. Then Monday morning Uber announced it was investing in Zipline and putting drone delivery into Uber Eats.

Here’s the breakdown.

President Trump signed proclamations Friday imposing Section 232 tariffs on imported drones and drone components, with rates running from 25% to 100% depending on product category and country of origin. The action sets lower rates for qualifying allied supply chains, with European Union imports capped at 15%, and builds in rate relief tied to U.S. manufacturing content. The highest burdens land on the categories where Chinese manufacturers hold near-total share, including thermal imaging aircraft. The White House framed the action as a supply chain security measure aimed squarely at China.

Section 232 is the national security tariff authority. Unlike reciprocal tariff actions that get negotiated away in trade talks, a Section 232 finding rests on a Commerce Department determination that import dependence threatens national security, and it survives across administrations. For drones, that determination is not a stretch. American public safety agencies, utilities, surveyors and agricultural operators have spent a decade building their fleets on hardware from a single Chinese vendor, and the Pentagon spent that same decade telling them not to. Separately, DJI got another opportunity this week to clear the security audit that would remove it from the Pentagon’s blacklist, which tells you the door is not fully closed even as the tariff wall goes up.

The market reaction was immediate and correct in direction, if crude in execution. Every domestic drone name rallied. But the engineering constraint deserves attention: magnets, batteries and a long tail of subcomponents are still overwhelmingly manufactured in China, and a tariff on finished aircraft does not conjure a domestic magnet industry. What tariffs do is change the arithmetic for the buyer. When a Chinese thermal drone costs double, the domestic alternative that was 40% more expensive last week is now the cheaper option. Between the FCC’s proposed retroactive Covered List ban and a 100% tariff ceiling, the U.S. government is helping to build the demand side of a domestic drone industry through regulation. Whether the supply side can scale into it fast enough is the open question, and it is the single most important variable in the US domestic sector for the next twenty-four months.

U.S. Central Command announced Thursday that it is launching Task Force Falcon Strike, described as the first multinational attack drone task force of its kind. The unit will operate air, surface and sub-sea one-way attack drones alongside regional partners. CENTCOM said it is still in the process of consulting and officially inviting those partners, and declined to name which countries it expects to participate. Adm. Brad Cooper, the CENTCOM commander, said the task force will expand on the success of Task Force Scorpion Strike, the drone squadron CENTCOM stood up in late 2025.

Scorpion Strike is the relevant precedent. That unit built its operational identity around the Low-cost Unmanned Combat Attack System, or LUCAS, which the U.S. reverse-engineered from a captured Iranian airframe. The American military took an adversary’s cheap strike drone, copied it, and put it on ships. Falcon Strike takes that model and extends it across domains and across allied inventories, with one-way attack systems operating from the air, the surface and below the waterline in a single command structure.

The word doing the work in the press release is “multinational.” Standing up a combined attack drone unit means partner nations contribute their own systems, which requires shared targeting, shared comms, shared munitions logistics and shared rules of engagement for expendable strike aircraft. That is doctrine, not procurement, and doctrine is what pulls procurement behind it for a decade. Every regional partner that joins Falcon Strike acquires a standing institutional requirement to buy, sustain and replenish attack drones. The Middle East has just become a structural export market for allied one-way attack systems, and the U.S. built the plumbing.

The Washington Post reported Thursday that the U.S. military has lost approximately 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones during the war with Iran, roughly 25% of the total fleet. The conflict is now in its sixth month. Reapers carry a unit cost in the range of $30 million and were designed for a permissive environment where the primary threat was small arms fire, not layered integrated air defense operated by a state adversary with a mature electronic warfare capability.

The Reaper is a 2000s-era airframe built for counterinsurgency, and it is being consumed at attrition rates that airframe was never priced for. This is what a large, slow, expensive, exquisite platform looks like when it enters contested airspace. Iran does not need to defeat American air power. It needs to make the exchange rate unfavorable, and destroying a $30 million ISR aircraft with a surface-to-air missile that costs a fraction of that accomplishes exactly that.

Twenty-five percent fleet attrition in under six months is the strongest argument yet for the attritable systems thesis, and the Pentagon has been making that argument internally for years. When the platform is expected to survive, you buy few and you buy exquisite. When the platform is expected to be lost, you buy many and you buy cheap. Reaper losses on this scale force that conversation into the budget, and they force it in the same season that Congress is writing the FY27 appropriations. The replacement for a fleet of $30 million ISR aircraft is not another fleet of $30 million ISR aircraft. It is a very large number of much cheaper things, made by companies that mostly did not exist ten years ago.

Uber and Zipline announced a strategic partnership Monday morning to scale drone delivery across the United States, with Uber making a strategic investment in Zipline and the two companies targeting one million drone deliveries per day by the end of 2029. First deployments begin later this year in existing Zipline markets, with planned expansion into dozens of U.S. cities. Uber Eats customers in those markets will be able to select drone delivery and receive orders in minutes.

Zipline is not a startup running a pilot program. The company operates on four continents, serves more than 5,000 hospitals and health facilities, completes a delivery somewhere in the world every 20 seconds, and has flown more than 135 million autonomous miles across more than 2.7 million deliveries. What it has lacked in the U.S. is demand density. Uber Eats supplies that instantly: millions of customers and hundreds of thousands of merchants already inside a dispatch system that Uber is now explicitly describing as a hybrid network routing each order to couriers, sidewalk robots or drones depending on which is best.

Commercial drone logistics has been three years away for about ten years. This is the deal that changes the trajectory, because the constraint was never the aircraft. It was regulatory approval and order volume, and the FAA’s BVLOS framework will address the first issue while Uber just addressed the second. One million deliveries per day by 2029 implies an operational tempo that would make drone delivery the largest autonomous commercial aviation activity in the country by an order of magnitude. The drone investment case has been carried by defense for two years. This is the week the commercial leg took another significant step forward.

An Italian NATO fighter jet shot down a drone in Latvian airspace on Friday, with Latvian officials attributing the incursion to Russian electromagnetic warfare interference. On Sunday, a NATO fighter downed a suspected Russian drone that breached Romanian airspace near the Ukrainian border. Reuters reported the same week that drone incursions are creating fear and disruption along NATO’s Baltic and Finnish borders, while German authorities continued working through the Leipzig airport incident and Bulgarian officials treated a drone crash on their territory as a wake-up call for national defenses.

These are not isolated navigation errors. They are the accumulation of a pattern that has been building all summer along the entire eastern flank, and NATO’s response has settled into an expensive default: scrambling fourth-generation fighter aircraft to shoot down drones that cost a rounding error of the sortie. That works exactly once as a demonstration of resolve and never as a sustainable defense posture. An air force that intercepts cheap drones with $30,000-per-hour fighter jets is losing the exchange even when it wins the engagement.

The alliance knows this, which is why European counter-UAS procurement is accelerating faster than any other category of defense spending on the continent. Germany’s drone defense gaps were the subject of open reporting this week. Taiwan, facing the same problem from a different adversary, passed its long-delayed annual budget on Saturday with drone spending included, while a government audit concluded the island’s existing counter-drone defenses fall short of the PLA’s evolving capability. Two theaters, two governments, one conclusion: the layer of air defense below the missile threshold does not exist yet, and it has to be built from scratch, creating a huge addressable market from scratch.

The top general at U.S. Northern Command added to a growing chorus of official warnings on Friday about weak drone defenses in the American homeland, and NORAD’s deputy commander said over the weekend that U.S. bases remain ill-equipped to stop drone attacks. These are not think tank assessments. They are the combatant commanders responsible for defending North America saying publicly that they cannot currently do it against the cheapest weapon on the modern battlefield.

The procurement response is visible in the contract flow. Epirus secured an $11 million Marine Corps contract through the Office of Naval Research for its High-power Microwave Autonomous Vehicle Operational Capability system, a truck-mounted directed energy platform built to disable drone swarms with a universal sled mount designed to pair with manned and unmanned vehicles across the service. Vertex will supply the Marines with Tempest anti-drone buggies. KBR’s Firefly high-energy system moved through testing. Every one of these is a point solution to the same structural problem, which is that a base perimeter designed to stop vehicles and people does nothing against something that flies over it at 400 feet.

Event security has become the visible edge of this. A White House official confirmed over the weekend that all 78 World Cup matches were covered by counter-drone technology, and Ondas subsidiary Sentrycs was selected to protect Jacksonville Jaguars games at EverBank Stadium, making the Jaguars the first NFL team to field an advanced counter-UAS capability with authority to help enforce temporary flight restrictions under the SAFER SKIES Act. The domestic counter-drone market is no longer a federal line item waiting on authority. It is stadiums, airports, utilities and campuses buying commercial systems now, with the legal framework finally catching up behind them.

Friday’s tariff proclamation lifted the entire domestic drone complex, but the earnings underneath the rally tell a more specific story about which companies are actually converting policy tailwinds into revenue.

AeroVironment (AVAV) had the most productive week in the group. The company announced a $117.3 million U.S. Army production contract for 82 P550 electric VTOL systems supporting the Army’s Battalion Reconnaissance effort, awarded through the Army’s UAS Marketplace initiative and marking the first full-rate procurement of the platform. Teledyne FLIR separately disclosed a significant order from AeroVironment for Argus XL counter-UAS sensors feeding AV’s Titan MS system, placed under AV’s three-year $500 million sole-source IDIQ supporting JIATF-401’s Domestic Shield program.

AeroVironment also announced a teaming agreement with Applied Intuition to integrate collaborative autonomy software into the Mayhem 10 launched effects system, enabling swarm and hunter-killer behaviors under single-operator supervision. Management told investors it sees unprecedented defense demand over the next two years against fiscal 2030 targets of $3.5 billion to $4.0 billion in revenue and 18% to 20% adjusted EBITDA margins.

Ondas Holdings (ONDS) posted record second quarter revenue of $83.8 million, up 67% sequentially and more than 13 times the $6.3 million it reported a year ago, with pro forma organic growth of 85%. New orders reached $175 million in the quarter with another $105 million booked so far in Q3. Backlog stands at $613 million as reported and $757 million pro forma including DZYNE and Cyberhawk, and the company raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance to a range of $525 million to $550 million against $1.4 billion in cash and investments. Shares still fell roughly 7% on the print because the bottom line missed. Ondas also won a multi-million dollar Israeli Ministry of Defense tender for the Digital Bat low-cost tactical attack drone program and took a $6 million AFRL award for the Long-Range Grasshopper aerial delivery system.

Red Cat (RCAT) reported Q2 revenue of $20.2 million, up 527% year over year, with gross margin improving to 16.1% from a 39% year-over-year gain. Operating expenses of $41.9 million produced an operating loss of $38.6 million and a net loss of $35.3 million, or $0.26 per share, with $325.6 million in cash at quarter end against a reaffirmed full-year target of $150 million to $180 million. Teal Drones advanced to Gauntlet II of the Army’s Drone Dominance program, the maritime Blue Ops division integrated Havoc’s collaborative autonomy software across its Variant 7 uncrewed surface vessels, and Roth MKM maintained its Buy rating with a $25 price target.

Unusual Machines (UMAC) was the single biggest tariff beneficiary in the market, jumping 24.6% Friday to a new 52-week high on the logic that a company built specifically to supply NDAA-compliant, U.S.-made drone components is the direct counterparty to a tariff on Chinese components. The company grew headcount from 141 to 240 during the second quarter and is now above 255, ended the quarter with $229.6 million in cash and roughly $367.5 million in working capital, and made a $30 million strategic equity investment in Powerus alongside a Powerus order to Unusual Machines exceeding $5 million. Management is targeting positive operating cash flow by the end of 2026 and operating breakeven around early 2027.

Kratos Defense (KTOS) rose alongside the group on the tariff news and has gained 21.4% over the past three months. The company completed its new hypersonic production facility ahead of schedule, which matters less for drones directly and more as evidence that Kratos can execute capital projects on the timelines its Valkyrie and collaborative combat aircraft programs will require as the Air Force scales autonomous wingman procurement.

• Section 232 tariffs of up to 100% on imported drones, with allied supply chains capped lower and the steepest rates aimed at the categories China owns.
• CENTCOM standing up the first multinational attack drone task force in its history across air, surface and sub-sea domains.
• Roughly 45 Reapers lost in six months, a quarter of the fleet, in the strongest case yet for cheap and attritable over expensive and exquisite.
• Uber investing in Zipline and targeting a million drone deliveries a day by 2029.
• NATO fighters shooting drones out of the sky over Latvia and Romania in a single weekend.
• NORTHCOM and NORAD saying openly that U.S. bases cannot stop drone attacks while Epirus, Vertex and KBR sell them the fix.
• Ondas posting $83.8 million in quarterly revenue and a $757 million pro forma backlog.
• AeroVironment adding a $117.3 million Army production award on top of a $500 million domestic counter-drone IDIQ.
• Unusual Machines up 24.6% in a session.

This was the week the U.S. government stopped debating whether it wanted a domestic drone industry and started the effort with import restrictions at the border.

$DRNZ, the REX Drone ETF, seeks to track the VettaFi Drone Index, providing exposure across the full drone ecosystem: combat, surveillance, logistics, commercial, and counter-drone.

An investor should carefully consider a Fund’s investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses before investing. A Fund’s prospectus and summary prospectus contain this and other information about the REX Shares. To obtain a Fund’s prospectus and summary prospectus call 844-802-4004 or visit rexshares.com. Read prospectuses carefully before investing.

Investing in the Funds involves a high degree of risk. As with any investment, there is a risk that you could lose all or a portion of your investment in the Funds.

The Fund, Trust, Adviser, and Sub-Adviser are not affiliated with the Fund’s underlying securities.

Funds distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC, member FINRA.